Blog

Archive for December, 2009

Indoor Tanning Tax Expected to Replace “Botax”

Tuesday, December 22nd, 2009

Good news for cosmetic surgeons came over the weekend; the so-called Botax tanning_taxhas apparently been dropped from the healthcare reform bill. Others aren’t so pleased about the changes, as a possible indoor tanning tax is reportedly being considered as the latest method of financing the new plan.

Just as representatives from the American Academy of Cosmetic Surgery spoke out against the elective cosmetic tax, people from the Indoor Tanning Association (surely a colorful bunch) are publicly opposing this new tax. Executive director John Overstreet says their industry, which consists mostly of small businesses, has been “thrown under the bus.”

What do you think? Is this a better proposal or just as flawed as the proposed elective cosmetic tax?

Medial or Superomedial Pedicle for Breast Lift or Breast Reduction*

Monday, December 7th, 2009

Fig. 1

Fig. 1

What is the best pedicle for breast lifting or breast reduction?

It seems that every pedicle type imaginable has been tried and everyone tends to have their favorite (Fig. 1). In general, this does imply an overall robust blood supply to the breast. However, it would be nice to know without a doubt which technique offers the best blood supply to the nipple areolar complex (NAC), best nerve supply and gives the most aesthetic breast shape and long-term stability. The problem is that there are hundreds of general articles on this topic but few are well done on specific blood supply volumes and how it relates to final breast lifting or breast reduction results.

For years, many believed that a sternal notch to nipple distance of greater than 30cm was an indication for a free nipple graft. A careful inferior pedicle proved that it could be used for SN-N distances of greater than 40cm with very low ischemic issues, but this technique has problems with ‘bottoming out’ of the inferior pole of the breast over time.

(more…)

Traditional Tummy Tucks Remain a Viable Choice

Friday, December 4th, 2009

This article by Dr. Cuzalina appeared in the publication Surge in Summer 2009

Everyone would love to have a flat tummy, preferably without surgery, yet this may be the only choice for many. The number of tummy tucks performed in the U.S. has dramatically increased over the last several years. A few reasons for this big increase is more acceptance in the general public for cosmetic procedures and a larger number of patients having bariatric procedures with massive weight loss and hanging skin. Also, the rise in advertising new, minimally invasive, “lunchtime laser this” or “laser that” have all contributed to more tummy tucks for better or worse.

Granted, the development of the lipo-abdominoplasty or “modified Avelar type” tummy tuck has been a wonderful new technique for the appropriate patient. However, there is no such thing as a minimally invasive abdominoplasty. Just because a surgery can be performed under local anesthesia does not make it “minimally invasive.”  A rush to abandon traditional techniques is not wise simply because a new procedure sounds great. For abdominal rejuvenation, traditional abdominoplasty should still occupy a major portion of one’s surgical gamut.

tummy

Figure 1. 35 year old female before and one month after a full lipo-abdominoplasty in order to both excise skin from pubis to above the umbilicus, as well as debulk the upper abdominal fat with liposuction and very limited or no undermining.

(more…)

Answer Our Online Poll: Do You Support the Botax?

Tuesday, December 1st, 2009

Since the Senate announced plans to tax cosmetic surgery last week, the media has been buzzing nonstop about it.  Plastic surgeons have basically been unanimous in their opposition to the bill, but we’ve also heard a few opinions reflecting support for the tax.

One blogger argued that pharmaceutical companies Allergan and Medicis should embrace the tax as a way to enhance PR and increase their lobbying power.  A caller I heard on National Public Radio said he thought the tax would be a good way to “nudge” talented surgeons toward positions in general medicine that need to be filled.

What’s your opinion?